最新二十篇文章公告:判決與法律命令之解析、契約與商業模式之範例
提供企業從事國內外商務交易上,所須知的各種法律規定及其風險的預防控管,而就各種法律規定、各項商業模式、各別法院判決與常用契約範本而寫的參考文章。本部落格之文章可讀性高、內容廣泛,從日常生活常見的買賣、租賃、公寓大廈管理到公司經營常見的產業模式、新創募資、合夥協議、投資併購、盡職調查、勞資關係、公司治理、上市上櫃、證券交易、技術移轉、經銷代理、國際商品買賣、供應鏈協議(OBM、ODM、OEM)、專利、商標、著作權、營業秘密保護相關之題目都有。本部落格的文章及其回覆,不代表本所的正式法律意見。如需進行各種商業交易的合法審查、各國商務契約的草擬談判、提起訴訟或應訊應訴、專利商標著作權之申請、授權及訴訟。 請就近聯繫 請聯繫新竹所03-668-2582 E-mail:info@zoomlaw.net 本所詳細資訊請自行參閱:http://www.zoomlaw.net 所長法學博士范國華律師敬啟

 

 

  根據中國專利法第33條的規定,「申請人可以對其專利申請文件進行修改,但是,對發明和實用新型專利申請文件的修改不得超出原說明書和權利要求書記載的範圍」。依照字面上的解釋,只要是出現在申請時的說明書揭露的內容,皆可在修正時增加在申請專利範圍中。

  至於中國專利申請案的修正時機,主要可以區分為兩個大類。第一大類如中國專利法實施細則第51條第1款所述,「發明專利申請人在提出實質審查請求時以及在收到國務院專利行政部門發出的發明專利申請進入實質審查階段通知書之日起的3 個月內,可以對發明專利申請主動提出修改」。

  第二大類則是如中國專利法實施細則第51條第3款所述,「申請人在收到國務院專利行政部門發出的審查意見通知書後對專利申請文件進行修改的,應當針對通知書指出的缺陷進行修改」。

  換言之,申請人對申請案提出修正的時機主要包括:1.提出實質審查的階段;2.收到審查意見的階段。當然不管在那個時間點提出的修正,都必須符合中國專利法第33條的規定。另外在收到審查意見通知書後,對申請案的內容所提出的修正,還必須符合「針對通知書指出的缺陷進行修改」的規定。

  中國專利審查指南第一部分第二章的8.2規定了,對於申請人提交的包含有並非針對通知書所指出的缺陷進行修改的修改檔,如果其修改符合專利法第33條的規定,並消除了原申請文件存在的缺陷,且具有授權的前景,則該修改可以被視為是針對通知書指出的缺陷進行的修改,經此修改的申請文件應當予以接受。對於不符合專利法實施細則第51條第3款規定的修改文本,審查員可以發出通知書,通知申請人該修改文本不予接受,並說明理由,要求申請人在指定期限內提交符合專利法實施細則第51條第3款規定的修改文本,同時應當指出,如果申請人再次提交的修改文本仍然不符合專利法實施細則第51條第3款的規定,審查員將針對修改前的文本繼續審查,例如作出授權或駁回決定。


專利專案經理 蕭錫裕

關鍵字:1.修正;2.修改;3.針對通知書指出的缺陷

文章標籤

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

 

 

隨著近年產業上開始著重智慧型裝置的應用以及整合,因應而生如何對各種app、軟體進行智慧財產權的保護也益發重要。筆者將會以系列文章討論台灣、中國、美國及歐洲現行對軟體專利的申請及保護,拋磚引玉希冀能夠邀請從業人事互相切磋討論。

 

首先軟體的智慧財產權保護可以粗分成程式碼(著作權)以及本身的核心概念(專利權)兩個不同的客體。前者不須進行申請,後者則為本文討論的核心。進一步而言,專利申請的標的則可分為物之標的以及方法標的。

 

 

 

軟體專利標的.jpg

 

文章標籤

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

足跡遍佈全球的眾律,今日韓國Hanbyol專利法律事務所Kay Kim, Patent Attorney  來訪本所,討論台灣、韓國專利制度與國際專利趨勢,會後互換台韓點心

13271535_10154219193304834_1301045150_o.jpg

13242159_10154219193224834_1889075075_o.jpg


文章標籤

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Bilateral Investment Treaties Concluded by Taiwan

 

A Bilateral investment treaty (BIT) is an agreement between two countries that sets up the rules for foreign investment in each other’s countries, providing companies and individuals with special rights and legal protections when they invest in a foreign country. Therefore, in order to address foreign investors’ concerns and promote investing, many countries have entered intro bilateral treaties for the protection of investment. When two countries enter into a BIT, both agree to provide protections for the other country’s foreign investors that they would not otherwise have, reducing many of the risks associated with foreign investment. It provides major benefits to foreign investors, including fair and equitable treatment. A key protection offered by the majority of bilateral investment treaties is to allow international arbitration in the event of an investment dispute, rather than to force foreign investors to sue the host-State in its own courts. In this context, BITs are typically created to promote investment in the host State.

The United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) reaches the following 23 bilateral investment agreements in force concluded by the Republic of China with the following contracting states:

 

No.

Contracting State

Date of signature

Date of entry into force

Text

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Rules of intestacy in Spain(II)

 

As mentioned before, Spain’s succession law operates a system of forced heirship, which means that certain percentage of the deceased’s assets in Spain must be transferred to people closely related to the deceased. Only through disinheritance the testator can deprive a forced heir of the property that would otherwise receive under the Spanish law of succession.

According to the Spanish Civil Code, it is possible to disinherit a child, and it is regulated by article 848 and following of the code.

Nevertheless, in order to disinherit, exclude someone to the inheritance, some legal requirements are met and it is mandatory that the testator performs the disinheritance through a will, which must also include a valid legal ground on which it is founded.

Bellow are the grounds to disinherit in the Civil Code:

 

  1. Specific reasons to disinherit descendants:

1. Children and descendants that have refused, without a legitimate reason, to support the parent or ascendant who disinherits him, and

2. Those who have mistreated the deceased in deed or seriously insulted him in speech.

3. The descendant who is sentenced in court for an attempt to take the life of the testator, his spouse, descendants or ascendants.

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

International Investment Treaty Arbitration

 

It was once a basic principle of international law that just a State could assert a claim against a different State when breaching its obligations to the first State’s nationals. However, the number of international treaty arbitration cases has grown dramatically in the past years, where foreign investors (individuals or legal entities) can claim against the “host States” where the investments where made. It is a very important factor in economic development, since it facilitates access to world markets, to worldwide distribution channels and other networks and it is a consequence from the phenomenon of globalization.

A country’s foreign investment climate is determined by the legal framework of foreign investment, which include, among others, stability of the legal conditions under an investor operates, the transparency of the system of local regulation and an effective system of dispute settlement. This last factor, an effective system of dispute settlement, is a particularly important one when it comes to legal protection of foreign investments.

In absence of other arrangements, a dispute between a foreign investor and a host State will usually be settled by the host State’s domestic courts. This fact is not an attractive option from the investor’s perspective for the following reasons: a) rightly or wrongly, the courts of the host State are not seen as sufficiently impartial in this kind of situations and b) the regular courts can often lack of the technical expertise required to solve complex international investment disputes.

Therefore, today direct arbitration between the host State and the foreign investor is the preferred option for this kind of disputes, and foreign investments enjoy international legal protection through a large number of investment treaties. There is as yet no single comprehensive treaty for the legal protection. Instead, there is a network of treaties which applies between two countries or among a number or countries.

In this context, Bilateral investment treaties (BITs) are international agreements between countries that provide companies and individuals with special rights and legal protections when they invest in a foreign country (the host State). BIT’s set out the terms and conditions for investment in one country by private companies and individuals of another country and are typically created to promote investment in the host State.

Investment treaties adopt an essentially private mode of adjudication dispute and that can make it a very similar figure to commercial arbitration, since both involve a claim by a private party before a tribunal of private arbitrators. However, notwithstanding the similarities, it would be a mistake to confuse both types of arbitration. Commercial arbitration originates an agreement between private parties to arbitrate disputes between both in a particular manner. The authority derives from the autonomy of every individual to chose and organize their own private affairs. On the other hand, investment arbitration originates in the authority of the state to use adjudication to solve disputes arising from the exercise of public authority. It is constituted by a sovereign act, as opposed to a private act.

 

 

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Rules of intestacy in Spain

 

If Spanish law applies, in the event of being no will, when the will is null and void or has subsequently become invalid, legal intestate succession regime applies. For most of Spain, the law can be found in the Spanish Civil Code (1889), but some of the Autonomous Communities (six out of seventeen) have their own private law.

The Spanish Civil Code therefore establishes the general law, and articles 930 and follows establish a list of beneficiaries, identifying three categories of heirs: relatives (descendants, ascendants and collaterals), the surviving spouse and the State, and they are arranged in hierarchy of classes, which is summarized below: 

  1. Descending direct line.
  2. Ascending direct line.
  3. Spouse.
  4. Collateral relatives
  5. The State.  

Under the principle of proximity of degree, the closest relatives exclude remote relatives (for example, a child excludes a grandchild and a parent excludes a grandparent), with the exception of the right of representation, in virtue of which the descendants of a predeceasing heir occupy that heir’s position. Also, relatives within the same degree inherit equally.

  1. The primary claim to inherit lies with the direct descendants, without any distinctions resulting from gender, age or filiation of the deceased, with no limitation of degree, but subject to a usufruct of 1/3 of the estate to the surviving spouse (if any). Children inherit the whole estate in equal shares and in their own right, but grandchildren and other descendants can only inherit by representation, taking the share which would have fallen to a predeceasing parent.
  2. In the absence of children and descendants of the deceased, his ascendants shall inherit, subject only to a usufruct of half of the estate in favour of surviving spouse. Father and mother shall inherit in equal shares, and in the event that only one of the parents survives, the surviving one shall inherit the whole estate from his child. In the absence of parents, the ascendants closest in degree will succeed. There is no limit of degree in the ascending line, nor is there representation in this case.
  3. When the deceased passes away without ascendants or descendants, the spouse inherits all of the deceased’s property. To be heir as a spouse, it is necessary to have been still married at the time of the death, this way a claim on intestacy is defeated by nullity, divorce and separation, whether judicial or de facto.
  4. In the absence of all of the above mentioned, the intestate estate passes to collateral relatives, beginning with siblings, who inherit equally, but also with the children of a predeceasing sibling taking the place of their parent.  
  5. Finally, and in absence of descendants, ascendants, spouse or siblings, the deceased’s estate passes to the State, or in the case of Autonomous Communities with civil competence in this matter, to those Communities.

 

 

 

 

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

「環太平洋戰略經濟夥伴協定」TPP

 

一、前言

在「WTO與貿易有關的智慧財產權協定」(WTO Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property, TRIPS) 出現以前,國際間對於是否以制定刑罰條款以保障智慧財產權,保持沉默。兩個重要的智慧財產權協定「巴黎公約」(the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 20 March 1883, Paris Convention) 與「伯恩公約」(Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works),均未強制會員國制定刑罰條款,將此視為各會員國的自主決定事項,尊重各該會員國內法的決定[1]

自我國決定加入「環太平洋戰略經濟夥伴協定」(Trans Pacific Partnership, TPP) 後,各界即開始好奇,TPP究竟會對我國法制造成何種衝擊,本文擬簡要介紹TPP的相關內容,以利我國企業針對未來的區域變動做出可能的預測與回應。

 

二、TPP的背景

        TPP的前身,來自新加坡、智利、紐西蘭與汶萊簽訂的跨太平洋經濟戰略夥伴協定 (P-4)P-4 是第一個連結太平洋、拉丁美洲與亞洲的跨境自由貿易協定,其成立之初即要求幾乎百分之百的貨品貿易自由化,但並未包括投資與金融服務兩大類。P-4的目標不在於獲得彼此間更優惠的市場進入,而是為將來的亞太自貿區協定,提供可能的參考範本。在美國加入後,以P-4為基礎擴張的TPP,方才開始吸引全球的目光[2]

        自日本加入起,至今TPP共有十二國參與談判,佔了全球GDP 38%、貿易量25%,儼然形成份量極重、足以影響下一代全球貿易規則的「鉅型區域貿易協定」(mega-regional trade agreement)[3]

        TPP所有談判中,美國扮演主導的關鍵角色。美國的經濟強項在於高科技、服務業與投資,它的目標是在付出最小代價下、透過TPP實現其於WTO杜哈談判回合所未能實現的目標,制定有利於己、超越現行WTO規範之貿易規則,將美國自己的國內法透過TPP向其他談判國輸出[4]

文章標籤

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

「東南亞區域全面經濟夥伴協定」RCEP

 

一、前言

為了因應全球化的趨勢,對於大多數企業而言,邁向國際市場為生存之道。相較於TPPRCEP 係以貨物貿易自由化為主要目標,未來還會分段進行投資、服務貿易、經濟技術合作、競爭政策、爭端解決以及智慧財產權等談判。

 

二、RCEP的背景

RCEP 的主要成員是以東協10國加上日本、中國、韓國、印度、澳洲、紐西蘭等六國,共計16個國家所構成,形成區域全面經濟夥伴關係 (Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, 簡稱 RCEP)RCEP成員國總人口約占全世界一半(34億人)GDP約占全世界三成(20兆美元)RCEP倡議實現後,其經濟規模將占全球年生產總值31.35%,達到23兆美元[1],是更近一步的自由貿易協定 (FTA)RCEP主要是以區域經濟一體化進行合作,成員國間相互開放市場、建立一個削減關稅及非關稅壁壘的自由貿易協定。其主要用意在於調和各成員國原產地規則和海關措施,並實行漸進式的服務貿易開放,同時在投資便捷化方面仍以准入後的國民待遇為主。目前RCEP20135月正式談判後所成立之貿易談判委員會 (Trade Negotiation Committee, TNC),包含貨品、服務、投資、競爭政策、經濟與技術合作、法律及制度、以及智慧財產權議題等8個工作小組[2]

實際上,台灣附近的國家都已經加入了RCEP這一行列,成為一個大經濟體,但台灣迄今尚未正式參與任何主要的區域經濟整合,未來外國企業前來台灣投資的情形可能因此減少,加上出口商品相較於其他國家多了關稅的障礙,將導致台灣在國際喪失競爭力,漸漸地被邊緣化,嚴重影響台灣未來的發展。

事實上,RCEP市場對台灣而言相當重要,2013年台灣對RCEP16個成員國的出口額占出口總額約70%,如果台灣沒有加入RCEP,可能會嚴重影響台灣的出口貿易跟投資活動。尤其是RCEP將形成泛亞洲經濟圈龐大市場,將有利其成員國企業延伸供應鏈和降低通關成本,進行優勢的投資佈局。由於臺商長期以來深度參與東南亞地區產業分工,將我國生產的半成品、零件、中間財等出口到東南亞,利用東南亞充沛勞動力生產製造後,再把大部分的完成品出口到美國和歐美市場,若台灣不能加入RCEP,關稅上的差別待遇將使我國貿易成本高於其他國家,會導致台灣在RCEP市場喪失競爭力。長期以來,台灣因為國際局勢而未能加入相關的東協經濟活動,對台灣的經濟發展有所影響。

 

文章標籤

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()

Types of wills in Spain

 

In accordance to Spanish Civil Code, Spanish wills may be common or special. The special ones are: military will maritime will and the will made in a foreign country. The common ones are: holographic, open and closed will.

 

Holographic will

A holographic will (testamento ológrafo) must be written entirely in the handwriting of the testator and shall be dated and signed by him or her in every page of the will. It must also be clearly drafted in order to ensure that the testator’s wishes are absolutely clear. No other formalities or witnesses are required.

On the death of the testator, it must be verified as genuine before a judge and the decedent’s handwriting is required to be authenticated by witnesses, who are the decedent’s closest relatives. Once it is verified, the judge will enforce the will’s contents.

 

Open will

Open will (testamento abierto) is the most common and suitable form of will for most people in Spain and it is a recorder document which contains the testator’s intentions as declared in the presence of a Notary Public.  Before a Notary Public the testator shall express, orally or in writing his last will to him. The Notary may request the presence of two witnesses, who must also be required in case the testator is blind or illiterate.

Zoomlaw 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()